Chagas disease (CD) is the most significant endemic zoonosis in Argentina. Two-thirds of affected individuals live in urban areas but only 10% globally are aware of their infection. Diagnosing Chronic Chagas (CCD) requires at least two serological tests, often limited to reference laboratories, creating logistical and economic challenges that delay timely diagnosis and treatment. Although primary health care (PHC) could address most health needs, the availability of Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) for CCD is limited in endemic countries due to regulatory and commercial barriers. In 2023, in a laboratory evaluation (Instituto Nacional de Parasitología, INP-ANLIS) we demonstrated that performance of six commercial RDTs available in Argentina were similar to reference methods, suggesting their potential for CCD diagnosis use (standard diagnostic", PAHO, 2018). Evaluation of RDTs in field studies across different clinical and epidemiological contexts is mandatory to provide recommendations for their use in CCD diagnosis. In this sense, independent prospective studies should be conducted to evaluate RDTs tests performances using direct blood samples under field conditions in different health care facilities and epidemiological scenarios. Moreover, trials conducted in different countries should be comparable with each other, so this protocol, produced according to STARD 2015 standards, is proposed as a complement to the PAHO (2025) recommendations. These RDT evaluation studies have the ultimate objective of incorporating them into diagnostic algorithms for better access to treatment and care strategy for patients with chronic CD.
Background and Rationale: Chagas disease (CD) is the most important endemic zoonosis in Argentina. Most affected individuals live in urban areas, and only a minority are aware of their diagnosis. Current diagnostic methods require multiple serological tests, often available only at reference laboratories, causing delays in access to diagnosis and treatment. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) offer a potential solution for timely detection in primary health care settings, but field validation studies are needed. Hypothesis: RDTs evaluated will detect infection with sensitivity \>90% and specificity \>95%. Primary Objectives: To evaluate the performance of two RDTs for supporting the management of chronic T. cruzi infection. To identify a high-performance diagnostic algorithm incorporating RDTs at the point of care (POC). Secondary Objectives Assess concordance of RDTs across sample types (capillary, venous, serum). Assess concordance between RDTs and the current diagnostic algorithm. Evaluate usability of RDTs for CD.: Estimate cost-effectiveness of implementing RDT-based algorithms in Argentina. Assess whether RDTs improve access to diagnosis. Estimate prevalence of T. cruzi infection in the study population. Primary Endpoints Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of RDTs compared to the standard reference algorithm. Diagnostic accuracy of RDT-based algorithms (Youden's index). Secondary Endpoints Concordance between sample types and between RDTs and reference algorithm (Cohen's Kappa). Usability scores of RDTs. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of RDT-inclusive algorithms. Accessibility scores (socioeconomic profile, costs, transport time, food, income loss). Proportion of positive samples among total analyzed. Study Design: Prospective, multicenter, observational, cross-sectional field study. Study Sites: Hospitals Mercante, Paroissien, Gutiérrez, and other health centers in Buenos Aires Province. Study Population: Inclusion: Pregnant women, blood donors, transplant recipients, suspected chronic T. cruzi infection, \>10 months of age, with informed consent/assent. Exclusion: Previous antiparasitic treatment, immunocompromised individuals, or conditions preventing protocol implementation/interpretation. Samples: Up to 50 µl capillary blood or ≥1 ml venous blood (EDTA) for RDTs. 3-8 ml venous blood (serum) for reference tests. Sample Size: Estimated N = 3,234, including 152 positive samples. Index Tests: Two Commercially available RDTs selected based on availability, cost, and performance. Conducted at POC per manufacturer's instructions. Results used exclusively for research. Reference Standard: Infection: reactive results from two distinct serological tests (ELISA, HAI, IFA). Non-infection: non-reactive results from two tests. Laboratory results will be blinded to RDT results and will serve as the patient care standard. Data Collection: Clinical and epidemiological data collected. RDT results recorded at POC; reference test results recorded at site laboratories. Duration 24 months. Ethics: Approved by the INP ANLIS Ethics Committee and the Central Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health of the Province of Buenos Aires. Funding: Approved by hospital directors in the province of Buenos Aires. Funded by the National University of José C. Paz (UNPAZ) and the National University of La Matanza (UNLaM). Approved by the Directorate of Epidemiological Surveillance and Outbreak Control. Chagas Prevention and Control Programme. Ministry of Health of the Province of Buenos Aires. (Provincial Programme against Chagas). Funded by FIND, Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Isidro Casanova, Buenos Aires, Argentina
La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina